Justified - Madisons Decision To Change US Foreign Policy...

Is it wrong for a president to do what he thinks is best for his country? As a young nation – which just finished a costly war – could America afford to get involved with another conflict with nations more powerful than itself? Madison – like Adams and Jefferson – had to deal with Washington’s foreign policy. Unlike the other presidents, Madison felt like the foreign policy wasn’t right; so he changed it from isolationism to intervention. The previous foreign policy – known as isolationism – meant that America had to try to stay out of disputes between opposing countries. After Madison changed America’s policy, it became known as intervention: America’s duty was to stand up for itself. Madison did a lot of things before changing the†¦show more content†¦Even though he tried peacefully to end the seizing and impressing, isolationism was not an option. As president, Madison had to decide what options he had next; he could have either keep trying to make a deal, and keep getting attacked, or he could have declared war to show that as a nation, we were willing to protect the security of our citizens. Additionally, as president he had duties to keep; he had to protect the people and he also had to demonstrate that we would stand up and fight if it was necessary. We would not give up easily. The idea that diplomacy wasn’t a logical idea is closely linked to how Britain wanted to undermine our newly formed country. This reveals that the British in Canada secretly aided the Native Americans; they wanted revenge since we were not siding with one side. While some Americans were travelling west to unclaimed territory, Native Americans attacked them (COULD IT WORK IN THE PASSIVE VOICE?). After some state officials examined the battlefield, the noticed that â€Å"Indians attacked an American army, and British guns were found on the battlefield†(â€Å"War of 1812, Mr. Madisonâ€℠¢s War†). Perhaps Britain was taking advantage of how young of a nation we were. Maybe they wanted to push us because they saw us like a child that they could push around. They were wrong. They were too blind to see that we were willing to protect ourselves; we were willing to become a respectedShow MoreRelatedNational Security Outline Essay40741 Words   |  163 PagesREALITIES IN THE VIETNAM DEBATE, Robert F. Turner 97 JNM: Morality and the Rule of Law in the Foreign Policy of the Democracies 100 Notes on DA Koplow: assignment 12 104 CHAPTER 1: National Security Law and the Role of Tipson 1NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ROLE OF LAW (Tipson) Goal Clarification: What is National Security? -National Security - Possible Definitions (Difficult to define) -Safety from foreign coercion or intimidation -UN Charter Article 2(4) - prohibition against â€Å"the threat orRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesIndividual Decision Making 165 Motivation Concepts 201 Motivation: From Concepts to Applications 239 3 The Group 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Foundations of Group Behavior 271 Understanding Work Teams 307 Communication 335 Leadership 367 Power and Politics 411 Conflict and Negotiation 445 Foundations of Organization Structure 479 v vi BRIEF CONTENTS 4 The Organization System 16 Organizational Culture 511 17 Human Resource Policies and Practices 543 18 Organizational Change and Stress